Skip to content
Explore the amazing world of sloths and wildlife conservati…

Will Additional Countries Follow Australia's Lead in Restricting Social Platforms for Under-16s?

The Australian decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward parallel bans.

  • Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted soon.
  • The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "an options in reserve".
  • In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The administration in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," said a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the local level amid federal stalemate.

  • Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
  • The state of Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, other states are similarly taking action.

  • The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured tone. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of Australia and others show that governments globally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.

Written by

Tara Carpenter DDS

Wildlife biologist and conservationist specializing in sloth research, with over a decade of field experience in Central and South American rainforests.

Slothub198

Type to search articles.