🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling is part of a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior House figure stated the court had yet again damaged its standing by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.